TJCTC Updates 5.9.2024

TJCTC Updates Header

Hello Judges, Constables, Deputies, & Court Staff,

How is it already May?! As you gear up for summer, we wanted to share upcoming training opportunities, grants, a new “Legal Question of the Month” feature, and of course more resources for your courts and offices.

Legal Question of the Month

Do I have to appoint a receiver?

No. You don’t have to appoint a receiver or issue a turnover order under Civil Practice and Remedies Code 31.002. However, you must consider applications for this relief and make your decision based on the application and case at hand. You should not have a blanket policy that you never issue receivers. Here is a snippet from some caselaw on the topic:

“Although subsection (a) of the statute uses the word ‘entitled,’ the use of ‘may’ in subsection (b) makes the remedy discretionary.” See Barlow v. Lane, 745 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. App. 1988), Beaumont Bank N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. 1991).

“We review the trial court’s decision for an abuse of discretion…whether there is evidence to support the decision is a relevant consideration. The ultimate question, however, is whether the court acted in an unreasonable or arbitrary manner or without reference to any guiding rules.” See Beeler v. Fuqua, 351 S.W.3d 428 (Tex. App. —El Paso 2011).

What this means is that if you just have a general rule that you don’t like receiverships and you don’t want to do them, you are probably abusing your discretion. However, if you review the applications closely or have some other reason not to grant the application and are not denying the judgment debtor other ways to collect their judgment (writ of execution, turnover order, etc.), then you can deny an application for a receiver. It would also make sense that if a particular receiver has acted improperly before, that you might have reason not to appoint them (just like if you no longer trust a process server, because they provided false information in a return).

The Ft. Worth Court of Appeals just ruled about a court using their discretion to deny the appointment of a receiver using the following logic:

“Employer’s attorney’s affidavit, in which she conveyed her ‘understanding’ that former employee owned nonexempt assets, ‘including bank accounts, income, personal property, and interest in real property,’ was not competent evidence of employee’s ownership of nonexempt property as would support issuance of turnover order to satisfy employer’s judgment against employee, because the affidavit showed no personal knowledge, and attorney’s recitation of her ‘understanding’ was conclusory.” Vaccaro v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc., 655 S.W.3d 485 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2022).

The Houston Court of Appeals ruled similarly:

Presenting some evidence of right to turnover relief and showing nonexempt status of judgment debtor’s remaining funds does not automatically mandate trial court to order turnover of funds to judgment creditor; rather, trial court has discretion to consider other relevant factors such as ability of judgment debtor to meet living expenses if turnover relief is granted. Brink v. Ayre, 855 S.W.2d 44 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993)

Grant Opportunities

We know that coming up with the necessary funding isn’t always easy. The Texas Association of Counties (TAC) shared a few grant opportunities for courts and rural county officials last month that we wanted to pass along.

Rural Mental Health Grant

Selected Grant Opportunities

Upcoming Training

Ask about Suicide to Save a Life (AS+K) Virtual Training

The Health and Human Services Commission is hosting a training on May 15 from 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. CDT on warning signs, clues and suicidal communications of people in psychological distress, and the actions to take to prevent a possible tragedy. Capacity is limited and pre-registration is required. RSVP at suicide.prevention@hhs.texas.gov

 

Justice Court Section Webinar – Civil Trial and Pretrial Rules and Practice in Justice Courts

Presenter, Rebecca Glisan, TJCTC Director of Curriculum & Staff Attorney

This course will cover some of the specific rules and common issues that arise in justice courts related to jury and bench trials as well as pre-trial motions and hearings. Topics will include continuances, mediation and agreed orders, summary disposition, discovery, evidence, development of the facts of the case, preparing the jury, and more.

Friday, May 17, 2024 from noon – 1:00 pm

Registration Link:  https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZ0uf-qprTwiEt0SfYLrJi12yZMulvcVHzA9%20#/registration

 

 Free Lexipol Training for Law Enforcement

One of the top-national law enforcement training organizations, Lexipol, has partnered with Dak Prescott’s Faith, Fight, Finish Foundation to offer some free training for law enforcement. This could be helpful to constables and deputies looking for additional training to complete all of their TCOLE requirements.

https://cycle.lexipol.com

Recording For Credit Posted

Mental Health Resources for Judges

TLAP helps judges with issues related to substance use or mental health disorders and maintains a list of volunteer judges who are interested in providing support to peers in crisis. This class will feature a discussion with TLAP and the resources available for judges dealing with issues such as vicarious trauma. The handouts for the course are also attached to his email.

Click here to view the recording

Sequential Intercept Model Mapping Opportunity

Texas Health and Human Services (HHSC) has published the Fall 2024 Sequential Intercept Model (SIM) mapping workshop application for communities interested in working with the HHSC Office of Forensic Coordination to map local behavioral health, criminal justice, or juvenile justice systems and develop action plans. The application deadline is May 17, and the application and more information about the SIM process is available at on the HHSC website.

Mental Health Awareness Month

This month is Mental Health Awareness Month, so we compiled the resources in the following newsletter for you to use throughout the month to bring awareness to the topic that so-often comes up in your courts.

You can also find additional news about the intersection of mental health and courts at JCMH News.

Mental Health Awareness Month 

We hope that you find these resources helpful and enjoy the warmer weather!

– Thea and the TJCTC Team

TJCTC footer

 

 

 

 

TJCTC Updates 2.23.2024

TJCTC Updates Header

 

Good Afternoon Judges, Constables, & Court Staff,

With February coming to a close, we wanted to share some more resources, updates, and especially some legal updates with you. 

Updates from Legal

Warrant Teletypes

Can a judge magistrate on the teletype of a warrant, or do they need an actual copy of the warrant?

You are not legally prohibited from magistrating on a teletype when you do not have a copy of the warrant, but it is definitely a best practice to have the warrant. Teletypes can sometimes have incorrect information or not have enough detail, which can then result in errors in setting bail. Here are some examples of potential problems:

  • You might not know if the warrant has been issued by the trial court judge (which would mean you are prohibited from making a bail decision) or by a magistrate (in which case you are required to make a bail decision), and this also impacts how the bail form is filled out in the PSRS.
  • If the teletype says, “no bail,” it is not always clear if it is saying no bail is allowed or just that there is not a recommended dollar amount.
  • Without the details from the warrant, you will often not have enough information about the circumstances under which the offense was committed, which is one of the factors that must be considered when determining bail.

These are just three examples; other problems could arise as well. So while it is not technically required, TJCTC recommends having a copy of the warrant to ensure that you make a good bail decision.

Texas Supreme Court Finalizes Updates for Rule of Judicial Administration 7

Earlier this week, the Texas Supreme Court published their final updates to the Rules of Judicial Administration regarding confidentiality policies.  The new Rule 7.1 requires all courts (including justice courts) to develop a confidentiality policy and rules for training and distributing the policy to court staff. They also helpfully included their own policy which may be used as a model for other courts.

Upcoming Webinars

TAA Lease Update for 2024, hosted by TJCTC (1 civil hr.)

February 23rd from 10:00 – 11:00 a.mTODAY!!!

Join TAA for a review of the latest version of its lease! This class will allow courts to fully understand the terms of the most commonly-used lease in eviction and other landlord-tenant disputes.

Registration link: https://txstate.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_a5eSTV1pSg2vrIosPqOScA#/registration

Implementing SB4: Magistrate’s Order to Return, hosted by TJCTC

Feb 29th from 2 – 3:00 p.m.

Instructor: Bronson Tucker

This webinar will cover SB 4, taking effect on March 4th, which allows magistrates processing defendants charged with Illegal Entry into Texas to issue orders for the defendant to leave the United States. It is critical that magistrates follow the law precisely to avoid liability, and these issues will be covered in this critical course.

Registration: https://txstate.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_3oUM3-19S4C40lTAYHqSRA

Impaired Driving Behavioral Interventions Around the Globe, hosted by The Impaired Driving Behavioral Interventions Interest Group

March 13 at 9:00 am Central Time

This webinar will highlight current evidence based impaired driving behavioral interventions conducted in Iran, Brazil, Canada, and the United States. An interactive panel will follow these presentations including:

  • How best practices and effective interventions can be implemented across the globe.
  • Where are the challenges to implement these strategies?
  • What does research tell us about the effectiveness of pre-trial/pre-sentence interventions for the impaired driver population?
  • Where are the gaps in training and education for these countermeasures?
  • What impaired driving technologies can help with implementation of interventions?

Registration: https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_M1A93de1SOa9Nz1lIEmTzQ#/registration

National Center for State Court Updates

NCSC Releases New Guide to Mental Health Diversion

This guide is intended to serve as a resource framework for courts and judges to use to promote and implement diversion strategies for individuals with behavioral health needs in their communities. Ideally, judges would collaborate with a range of system stakeholders to examine the entire diversion continuum but could also focus on one step of the process at a time. This guide focuses on jail diversion systems, post arrest, and pre plea. NCSC also hosted a Mental Health Diversion webinar in December 2023 on “Lessons from the Field.”

Download from the NCSC website.

NCSC Inclusive Language Resources

NCSC updated the Gender Inclusive Language Toolkit to reflect the best practices learned since initially releasing it over a year ago. It has a fresh look and light restructuring, but the message is the same. Check it out!
Also, here is a sample benchcard for quick tips and best practices that you can download. While the bench card is primarily directed to judges, the guidance in it is applicable to all professionals in the legal field.
Finally, if you have not yet watched the Tiny Chat or webinar on the topic, they are great quick references.

Updates from the Judicial Commission on Mental Health (JCMH)

JCMH routinely sends out updates including resources and training that is helpful for justice courts. If you would like to get these updates, subscribe to their email list.

Update on Legal Calls

We have had a large number of calls finding their way into the wrong voicemail inboxes. Remember, please dial 512-347-9927 and press “1” for legal calls. If you don’t, the voicemails end up with our program staff who also have a high call volume. Often times your legal call messages end up lost in their inboxes and don’t get transferred to the legal team for several days.

As always, we are looking forward to seeing you at a program in the upcoming months. We have a very busy Spring full of education events for you lined up from TJCTC!

Thea & the TJCTC Team

TJCTC footer

TJCTC Updates October 11, 2023

Good Afternoon Judges, Constables, & Court Staff,

It has been a while since we have sent out a legal update, so we have quite a few things to share. Below we discuss several hot legal topics, updated resources, new online content, and our most up-to-date legal question procedure, so make sure you scroll all the way to the bottom!

 

Hot Topics

Administrative Closure in Receivership

Many courts have received requests from a receiver to “administratively close” a receivership once a payment plan has been reached between the receiver and the debtor. There isn’t statutory authority to administratively close a receivership.

When a court receives a request like this, they may:

  • do nothing and keep the receivership as is,
  • extend the receivership,
  • sign an order limiting or changing the receiver’s powers if they no longer need them to complete their duties, or
  • end the receivership.

If a receivership is ended or expires and the debtor defaults on their payment plan, the judgment creditor can always seek the re-appointment of a receiver or utilize some other judgment enforcement tool.

TJCTC recommends that if a receivership is extended, the court keep regular check-ins as a requirement of the receiver, at least once every 180 days. These check-ins can easily be done by phone, Zoom, or email.

Often these requests come to court because the receiver is seeking payment of their fees, at least in part. Courts have the discretion to order receiver fees disbursed at any time during the receivership for work that has already been performed.

Enforcing Arbitration Awards

With the rise of virtual arbitration, courts are receiving more requests to enforce an arbitration award. We discuss the full process for handling these cases starting on page 73 of the Civil Deskbook. Please review this if you receive one of these requests.

Sometimes arbitrations are conducted by large national arbitration companies, so the packets they provide may seem strange, as they cite the Federal Arbitration Act instead of the Texas Arbitration Act. However, in the cases we have discussed with judges, they are still properly filed here, because the arbitration took place here in Texas (the parties were here when they logged onto the arbitration).

HB 3956 – DNA Samples

This bill requires law enforcement to collect DNA samples from any defendant arrested for a felony offense during the booking process. This might affect judges who magistrate, because if a defendant refuses or for some reason a sample is not collected, Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 17.47 requires this to be listed as a condition of bond for felony offenses.

 

Updated Resources

You may have already noticed, but the updated Deskbooks are being posted. Please be patient while we finish the last few updates and work diligently to update the forms, charts, checklists, and other resources.

*New* Interpreters & Spanish Terminology Self-Paced Module

We just posted a brand-new module that covers legal issues related to interpreters, including help for appointing interpreters, a Spanish/English legal glossary, and more! Judges and court staff can get 3 hours of credit for completing the module. Constables and their staff may also find this module to be a good resource when dealing with persons with limited English proficiency or language skills.

*New* Juvenile Criminal Diversions Webinar

This webinar will discuss the details of the new Juvenile Diversion procedures as well as leave time for your questions. Please join us on Monday, October 30, 2023 at 2:00 pm on Zoom. Registration will open soon, and you should receive an email.

 

Legal Question Procedure

The legal department at TJCTC is happy to assist you with your legal questions, and we want to remind you of the best procedure to get your questions answered as quickly as possible. We know in the recent past we have had some phone issues, but now that should be all cleared up!

You have two options:

  1. One of the attorneys will be answering legal questions from 9:00 am – noon and 1:30 – 3:00 pm daily when we are not traveling to or teaching at a program. You can reach them by dialing 512-347-9927 and pressing 1 when asked for an extension. Note, often you may have to leave a voicemail and wait for a call back, because we are either on another call or at a program. Please note that missed calls without voicemails will not be returned.
  2. Post your question to the legal board. Within 5 business days (often sooner) one of the attorneys will post the answer to your question.

FAQ:

Can’t I just call my favorite attorney?

No. Any legal question voicemails or calls will be forwarded to the attorney on call. This is to ensure that we have someone answering calls each week and the other attorneys can work on resources, materials, and classes for the upcoming programs.

Can I just send an email?

No. Emails with legal calls will receive a reply asking you to post on the legal board or call the legal line for the same reasons listed above.

 

Thank you so much for your time and attention!  The TJCTC team is looking forward to another great year with all of our court staff, constables, and justices of the peace. Note, these new update emails will be saved to the TJCTC Blog, The Docket, so you can access them anytime.

All the Best,

Thea & the TJCTC Team